Three spans cable-stayed bridge & Shapes of the pylons
ICDAS CSB 2019.00R allows you to create three spans cable stayed bridges. It can be a short footway bridge or a long span road bridge. The input is parametric and entered in Excel file. By changes of few inputs and run Add-Ins one will get a cable stayed bridge in A-Pylons (Top), H-Pylons (Centre) and V-Pylons (Bottom) shown below.
Figure: Cable stayed bridges in A-Pylons (Top), H-Pylons (Centre) and V-Pylons (Bottom)
Cable arrangements The longitudinal layout of the cables is a fundamental issue due to the following considerations: § Structural performance of the bridge, static and dynamic § Method of erection and the economics § What desired effects regarding architectural impression. ICDAS switch the cables arrangements of harp, fan or semi-fan system by vertical spacing h5 at the pylon. Both of Revit and Lusas models will be updated accordingly.
Figure: Harp system, h5=6300m In harp system the declination angle of each cable is constant, which gives the same anchoring design at the deck considering the case of longitudinal slope of the deck is 0.
Figure: Fan system, input h5=500m In fan system all cables are connected to the pylon theoretically at the same height. This system has several advantages compared to the harp pattern: · Vertical component of cable is more effectively used to carry the sectional weight of the deck · Longitudinal component of the cables give less compression in the deck · Bending of the pylon caused almost by one longitudinal force only as the sum of all cables connected to it. However, the connection zone of the cables at the pylon in fan system is heavily concentrated, which requires special design and analyses.
Figure: Semi-Fan system, h5=3000m Semi-Fan system combines the advantages of the harp and the fan systems. In this system the vertical spacing of the cables on the pylon can better be arranged than the concentrated zone of the fan system and the bending of the pylons remains moderate.
Back to top menu |